穆斯林人有目标吗?
没有目标而进行暴力行为的穆斯林现被称为恐怖分子。
这种标记做法使我们更加接近第三次世界大战的边缘。
为了"反恐战争",我们不惜炸毁世界。
为了和平,我们需要认真调查最重大的恐怖案件,以
查明这些案件是否确实是没有目标的。
911当然是第一个案件。我们知道前两架飞机分别击
中了世界贸易中心和五角大楼。但是有没人知道第三
架飞机的目标是什么?
看,我们不知道吧?而且我们不在乎。那是因为我们
的视线停止只在很多人被杀了。我们需要找出每架飞
机的实际目标,然后才能知道第三架飞机的目标。
因此,第一架飞机是对资本主义的攻击。第二架飞机
是军国主义的进攻。第三架飞机的方向是什么?让我
们问问自己,除了美国的资本主义和军国主义之外,
什么是穆斯林最不喜欢的重要标志?
那是"美国的放肆文化"。因此,这架飞机必然是专为
好莱坞而借用的。
就目标而言,穆斯林是在打掉资本主义,军国主义和
美国文化的象征。从那以后,仅三分之二的成功足以
引发美国一路的下滑。
现在,在美国人反驳之前,让我们也来看看在中国新
疆省发生过类似的恐怖案件,也是由穆斯林实施的。
那里的穆斯林将无辜的男人,妇女和儿童砍杀,用刀
砍死和用棍打死,显然没有目标。
但是今天,我们看到了他们行为的实际后果。 那所谓
"恐怖"行为是出于新疆的穆斯林多数群体所感到的绝
望。最终,它确实呼吁出中国中央政府的有效措施来
改善他们的生活。结果带给该地区的和平与繁荣。谁
说他们没有目标?
实际上,在911事件发生前十天,联合国在南非开了
一个讨认种族平等的大会,让巴勒斯坦也对以色列对
他们的压迫呼吁出绝望。但是,以色列,美国和英国
没有理会,而直接地走出了会场。
所有这些都是因为小布什总统启动了美国的强硬外交
政策。当时美国与中国在海南岛的对抗也同样引起了
全世界正义人士的抗议。特别是在一个
Asiaweekly.com论坛上发生了一次这样的抗议辨认,
其中包括美国在南非联合国大会上的傲慢行径。抗议
的言语中包括一句严厉的警告:"美国对穆斯林如此
公然的压迫,应该受到一次严厉的惩罚。"
十天后,果真如此。当"恐怖分子"于911袭击美国时,
地狱开爆了。Asiaweekly.com的认坛上的亲美份子用
大量的死亡恐吓和炸弹威胁作出了激烈凶猛的反应。
反应是如此恐怖,以至于逼了论坛去自毁。
难怪穆斯林对美英以的反应也同样恐怖。
有人可能会问,是否有:没有目标的恐怖行为?好吧,
看看最近的香港民主抗议活动。他们确实是非常恐怖
的,但是在六个多月之后,我们仍然没有看到任何目
标。
历史的最初,正是这种抗议者及其在西方的支持者将
穆斯林抗议者称为"恐怖分子"。我们是否将整个真相
反转了!
看看当前美国杀害了一名顶级穆斯林将军的事件。双
方现在都被困在,骂对方是恐怖分子。是不是我们应
该停止那个"反恐战争"了?这场无聊的对骂已使我们
陷入了第三次世界大战的边缘。

                  MUSLIMS HAVE OBJECTIVES
Muslims carrying out violent acts without objectives 
have been labelled terrorists.  This practice of labeling 
has brought the war ever closer to the brink of WWIII.  
We are ready to blow up the world in the course of our 
"War on Terror".
For sake of peace, we need to make a serious effort to 
search into the major terrorist acts, to see if it's true 
that they have been enacted without objectives.
911, of course, is the first case.  We know the first two 
planes hit the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, 
respectively.  But does anybody know what the third 
plane was intended for?
See, we don't know? And we don't care.  That's because 
our sight stopped at a lot people being killed without 
obvious objectives.  We need to seek out the actual 
purpose for the act, before we would be able to know 
where the 3rd plane was heading.
So, the 1st plane is the attack of capitalism.  And the 2nd 
plane is the attack of militarism.  What is the 3rd plane 
heading for? Let's ask ourselves what's the most 
important symbol, besides capitalism and militarism in  
America, that the Muslims don't like?
It's the "American liberal culture".  So, the plane is 
intended for Hollywood.
The Muslims are right on target, in term of their 
objectives - destruction of the symbols of capitalism, 
militarism and American culture.  And two out of three 
were enough to started America's down slide ever since.
Now, before America calls "foul", let's look at a similar 
terrorist act in China's Xinjiang Provinces, also 
performed by Muslims.  There, the Muslims aimlessly 
axed, knifed and clobbered innocent men, women and 
children, obviously without objectives.
But today, we see the positive consequences of their 
actions.  The "terroristic" act was a cry of hopelessness 
by the Muslim majority in Xinjiang.  And it finally did cry 
out effective measures by China's central government 
to improve their conditions.  The result is peace and 
prosperity for the region.  Who say there were no 
objectives?
In fact, in the 911 incident, just ten days before it hit, 
there was also a cry of hopelessness by Palestine, 
regarding their oppression by Israel, in a United Nations 
Conference on Races in South Africa.  But instead of 
doing something about it, Israel, America and Britain 
just simply walked out the meeting.
All this happened because of President Bush, Jr.'s 
hardline diplomatic policy toward America's adversaries.  
An aggressive confrontation with China at Hai Nan Dao 
has caused protests from people of justice around the 
world.  Particularly one such protest occurred on the 
Asiaweekly.com forum, that includes the arrogant 
action by America at the United Nations' Conference in 
South Africa.  The protesting language consisted of a 
stern warning that "America deserve a good spanking 
for such a blatant oppression toward the Muslims."
Sure enough ten days later, hell broke loose when the 
"terrorists" hit America on 911.  The militant forumites 
on the Asiaweekly forum reacted to the earlier warning 
with death and bomb threats.  The reaction was so 
ferocious that it caused the forum to self-destruct.  
No wonder the reaction of the Muslims to the walkout 
was just as "terroristically" ferocious.
Then, some may say, is there any terrorist act that does 
not have objectives?  Well, look at the recent Hongkong 
democracy protests.  They have been indeed very 
terroristic, but, after more than 6 months, we still do 
not see any objective.  
And, originally, it was such protesters and their backers 
in the West who have been calling the Muslim 
protesters "terrorists".  We might just have everything 
reversed!
Looking at the current event of the killing of a top 
Muslim general by America.  Both sides are now stuck 
at calling each other terrorists.  Isn't it time to put this 
"War on Terror" to rest.   We are being pulled into 
WWIII by this nonsensical game of names calling.