领导的选择

如果一个国家不是由一个知道如何领导的人领导,而是依靠虚假的手段,例如自私选民的民主投票和对上帝的信仰,他的领导是无效的,应该被取代。而且国家必须修改领导选择的方法。

专业资格应该是领导者的首要要求。他的实际成就是第二条件。基因组成也可以保证前任领导人的出色表现的连续性。最后,对该国最好的思想家们的看法应该作为最终的推荐和批准。

从逻辑上讲,其他国家的介入和不知情的普通民众的意见都与选择优秀领导人的结果有不良的影响。

唐纳德特朗普在他的领导中依靠民粹主义。但民粹主义是暴民统治。而暴民统治正在快速暴露那民主主义实际上就是这样。难怪,民主国家总是拥有强大的战争利器,危及我们全球的生存。

         LEADER SELECTION

If a country is not led by someone who knows how to lead, instead depend on artificial means, such as self-serving voters in democratic balloting and faith in God, he's useless as a leader and should be replaced.  And the country's very leader selection process must be revised.

Professional qualification should be the number one requirement for a leader.  His track record is the second critierium.  Genetic make up could also be a assurance of continuity of the good job done by previous leaders.  And finally, the opinions of the best sound minds of the country should at least serve as recommendations and final approval.

Logically, the opinions of other countries and those of the uninformed common people of the country are both equally counter to selecting a good leader.

Donald Trump relied on populism in his leadership.  But populism is mob-rule.  And mob-rule is fast being exposed as what democracy is really all about.  No wonder, democractic countries are invariably powerful war machines, jeopardizing the very existence of our glob.