APPENDIX IV.   JAPAN IN CHINA
What exactly Japan did in China?
To answer this question, we first need to 
thorough dissect Chiang Kai-shek.  Then 
we need to understand what Japan did not 
do first, before homing in on what Japan did, 
that were either harmful or beneficial to 
China.
Chiang Kai-shek was a Japanese military 
officer whose commission had never been 
discharged.  His second, adopted son was 
even born of a Japanese mother. 
After his final downfall in China, before he 
was chased out to Taiwan, his wife, Song 
Meilin, asked him to go to Europe instead of 
Taiwan, Chiang replied, "Any other place I 
would rather go, besides Taiwan, it's Japan."
Even in Taiwan, the successor of the Chiang 
dynasty, designated by Chiang's son, Chiang 
Jing-guo, was a person who openly 
professed that he was Japanese at heart.
We know Chiang was a die-hard 
anti-Communist.  And after the Xian 
Mutiny, Chiang expand his hatred to the 
general Chinese population.
So, unbelievable as it may be, as a Chinese 
leader, Chiang's hatred of his own Chinese 
people was only matched by his love for 
China's supposed enemy Japan and his 
subservient attitude toward America.
And as to Chiang's relationship with 
America, it's a criminal pact between two 
misfits.  Chiang was ready to sell out China 
in any way if the price was right, while 
America tried to "fool all the people, all the 
time".
America's unquenchable appetite to 
colonize Asia compelled America to buy 
favors from someone who consorted with 
America's deadly enemy Japan.
Also there was this odd couple in Chiang 
and wife, Song Meiling, in their triangle 
Sino-America love-hate affair. 
Chiang cheated America in military 
collaboration.  Song cheated Chiang by 
having an affair with an America Republican 
Presidential candidate.  America loved 
Song for being anti-Asia but detested Chiang 
for underhand dealing with Japan.
So, this relation of zero loyalty from 
Chiang's side and negative trust from 
America's side, mixed in by the relation of 
Chiang's hatred for China and love for Japan, 
resulted in many forgeries and fabrications, 
with a final loss-loss-loss end for all three 
countries involved.
The reason for this disastrous ending was 
because Chiang, in his effort to satisfy his 
vengefulness, sacrificed the interests and 
harmed the images of both of his partners 
in crime, along with record-breaking 
number of dead Asians both in China and 
Japan.
This perfect storm of confused relations 
opened a floodgate of propaganda and 
distortion.  And the victim is history.
Today, all three nations' leaders are trying to 
enforcing censorship on truths.  America, 
especially, sealed most lies with two 
abombs, and occasionally threatening with 
both overt and covert military, monetary 
and political actions.
With the current accelerated arms race on 
going in Asia, no one wanted to look at its 
cause, which is the distorted history.  We, 
thus, are heading straight into WWIII.
Our history revision effort here is aimed at 
preventing WWIII by diverting the war of 
bullets to war of words.
So, obviously we need to start from a peace 
perspective.  And we need to use reverse 
logic -- proceed from effects to causes,to 
break through a lot of ironclad lies.
For starters, you win the war, so you are 
more savage than the other guy.  And 
being the victor, you must have lied more, 
etc.  If you don't like it, go wait for WWIII.
Before discussing what Japan did in China, 
let's first get, what Japan did not do, out of 
the way.
Let's start with the death knot of Sino-Japan 
relation, the Nanking Massacre.  As 
described in Appendix I. Nanking Massacre 
by Chiang Kai-shek, Nanking Massacre was 
mainly a vengeance by Chiang for the 
humiliation he suffered one anniversary ago 
at the Xian Mutiny. 
Business-wise, he fabricated the Nanking 
Massacre photo album for Hollywood to 
make an award-winning documentary to 
smear Japan ahead of the real war.
The upshot here is: Japan didn't do it!
Most killings were by Chinese troops doing 
them unto to themselves during the frantic 
retreat, and by secret contract killings by 
Japanese special execution squads, both 
caused by orders from Chiang.
If there is any more doubters out there, let 
me alert them that we have not yet seen 
the full testimony of the Nanking Defense 
Commanding General Tang, even though 
most of you have already been lied to by 
Chiang that General Tang was shot for 
desertion.
Well, in actuality, General Tang was rescued 
by the Communists and lived to an old age 
as a high official.
The second crime of Japan's invading China, 
as charted by Prime Minister Tanaka, in his 
plan, the Tanaka Memorial, was also 
something that didn't happen.  The Tanaka 
Memorial was a forgery, probably of Russian 
origin. 
And Japanese troops were sent to China and 
everywhere else in Asia to either chase the 
Western colonists out of Asia or to prevent 
Western arms from shipping in.
The Tanaka Memorial was a masterpiece of 
propaganda for dividing and conquering 
Asia by the Western colonists.  It did 
caused a lot of mutual killings between 
Japan and China.  But the blood debts 
should be owed by the West.
Third, and the greatest, tragic event that 
Japan did not do was the Yellow River Flood 
of 1938.  But prior and during WWII, 
Chinese were told that Japan did it, until 
Mao came along and exposed the lie only 
after the damage was done.
Later, Chiang Kai-shek's men were finally 
forced to confess that this "lie" was to make 
"Chinese people hate Japanese."
Yes! Although Japan didn't do much, but 
America and its Chinese puppet sure have 
done a lot -- to make "Chinese people hate 
Japanese!"
Japan still maintains the Sino-Japan War 
was just a "China Incident".  China called it 
"Resisting Japan" war.  But, regardless of 
how many senseless lives have been wasted, 
it should be called a war to "Resist Asia and 
Aid the West".
Let's proceed to see what Japan did in China, 
starting with some comparison of history 
between Japan and China.
Around 1850's, China had a bad experience 
in her encounters with the West.  An 
indigenous Christian Crusade sandwiched in 
by two Opium Wars almost ended China her 
5000 years' run as the head of household of 
the world. 
The ruling Qing Dynasty gallantly rejected 
Westernization with her last breathe.  But 
the pro-Western warlords' were eager to 
Westernize by selling China out to the West.
Two suicidal attempts to resist the West by 
indigenous forces were the Boxer Rebels 
and the peasant liberation army of Mao 
Zedong.  The Boxers were only able to 
keep China from being cut up by the West. 
And Mao's force escaped extermination in 
the arduous Long March by finding 
sanctuary in the Japan-occupied territory.  
Then Mao was able to buy some time when 
a mutiny in the traitor government of 
Chiang Kai-shek occurred in the city of Xian.
Finally, it was the culture of Asian 
unification, the tradition of peasant 
liberation and some upgrading of weapons 
by the surrendering Japanese that propelled 
Mao to liberate China, North Korea and 
Vietnam.
And the little white ping pong ball knocked 
down America's nuke fence around China to 
start China off on a path back to her past 
greatness.
But all of the above mentioned events 
would be futile, if not for Mao's mission 
impossible of pulling China out of the 
century-old opium holocaust.
History's neglect on this topic is why history 
itself is now being put on trial for leading 
future generations astray -- directly into 
WWIII.
In Japan, Emperor Meiji went for the best of 
both worlds -- Eastern culture and Western 
militarism.  However, Western militarism 
accompanied by industrialization forced 
Asian culture and tradition to take 
backseats.  Japan retreated into the 
Western jungle of strong eating the weak.
Still, Japan used her newly gained military 
might to preserve China into the 
Manchuguo, the Mongolian Government 
and the Nanking Government of Wang 
Jing-wei.
This prepared the preconditions for Mao to 
eventually reunify the separated 
governments into one China, while losing 
much territory that Japan was unable to 
seize back from the Russians.
And during the war, Japan blockaded 
American arms shipments from entering 
China into the hands of the pro-West 
puppet government of Chiang Kai-shek. 
And after the war, as if it's hard to 
understand by Westerners and Chinese 
alike, Japan naturally passed the baton of 
Asia liberation to Mao in the form of 
military technologies, especially in areas of 
artilleries and flying.
A better equipped Mao by the Japanese 
shocked Chiang to seek shelter in Taiwan, 
as well as ended America's winning streak 
of wars since its founding, in Vietnam.
At this point of our history retelling, it 
should be asked why Japan could not 
accomplish what Mao did?
Mao was smeared even worse by Chiang as 
"Commie Bandits", than Japan was by 
America and its puppets, as invaders.  Also 
Japan was far more superior than Mao in 
weaponry.
Well, Japan slipped up big time in unifying 
Asia with her mishandling of the opium 
holocaust in China.  Japan's allowing 
opium trafficking in Asian mainland, but not 
at home, differentiated Japan from Mao 
and weakened Japan's ability to unify with 
China and Asia.
Also, Japan did not heed the lesson of the 
Manchu Monarch family, who used culture 
to conquer and rule China.  Japan made 
Asian culture to take a backseat to Western 
militarism.
This left Japan with the only option of 
passing the baton of Asia liberation to Mao 
after losing to America due to population 
depletion in Japan's small homeland 
islands.
Now here again, we see Mao was a born 
winner.  He took Japan's population 
depletion as a measure of the extreme 
savagery by Americans that he asked the 
Chinese moms to give birth faster than 
America could kill.
Although it's easy now for us to say this was 
no need, therefore, a wrong policy by a 
tyrant.  
People today in China are still crying about 
the tremendous suffering during the 
Culture Revolution when Mao insisted the 
America's were coming down with their 
nukes on China.
Yeah, the hindsight is very accurate.  But 
the most accurate of it all is Mao won.
In case some Asians still find it hard to part 
with their view that China and Japan are 
two entirely different species of Asians, in 
that they could not unite to repel the West, 
let me finish the comparison with how they 
have been treated by the West.
The Manchus of China's Qing Dynasty 
fought against opium but failed, because of 
refusing to accept Westernization.
Japan, on the other hand, sacrificed her 
conscience for financial gains through 
opium trafficking in China.  Unlike the 
Manchus, Japan tripped herself up by not 
observing the moral aspect of Asian culture.  
But Mao Zedong succeeded and was able to 
liberate China, along with North Korea and 
Vietnam, while many people even accuse 
Mao of anti-Confucius.  Why?
Actually Mao had a higher morality 
standard than all other moralists.  This 
standard was important to do the mission 
impossible of beating back the immoral 
Western barbarians.  This morality is:

"We Chinese would rather starve to death, 
than be pissed off to death!"

That's how he used the exhaustively 
suffering and spiritually terroristic Culture 
Revolution to scare America from nuking 
China, also won the Korea War with much 
inferior weapons, endured the famine 
during the Great Leap Forward and the 
Taiwan Strait War, in which nuke cannons 
might have been used by America, and won 
the Vietnam War. 
And now, how about the Christians in both 
China and Japan?
The apocalyptic total wars of China's 
internal genocidal Christian Crusade of the 
Taiping Rebellion also had a parallel in 
Japan's Shimabara Rebellion, in which Japan 
exterminated her Christian population.
Interestingly, the number of Christians   
wiped out in the Shimabara Rebellion 
around Nagasaki was almost identical to the 
39,000 who died from the Nagasaki atomic 
bomb.  And it was by an all-Christian 
bombing crew.
However, what does Japan think of China? 
The following two Japanese people who 
have a lot to do with China can give us an 
Asian perspective:

ASIANISM ADVOCATOR, ISHIHARA 
YOSHIYA:  Asianism is a unity of the three 
countries of East Asia, China, Japan, and 
Korea, and together they should resist the 
invasion of Western white power. Ishihara 
not only believed in Asianism, but also 
believed in Buddhism.
He thought the contestants in the "Final 
War", could be only the United States and 
the East Asian Allies, centered around the 
Japanese emperor. "The war will determine 
whether the Asian 'rule of culture' ,or the 
Western 'bullying way', can dominate the 
world."
The main point of Ishihara's overall strategy 
was that in East Asia, the historical leader, 
China, was no longer able to lead the yellow 
race in East Asia to defeat the white race. 
Therefore, Japan's historical mission now is 
to shoulder this responsibility in East Asia 
by becoming the leader of East Asia, and 
lead East Asia countries, in integrating its 
resources, and finally making a decisive 
battle against the representatives of the 
West, the United States. Ishihara even tried 
to persuade the Japanese to give up 
Japanese citizenship, and join the Five-Race 
United Manchukuo. This is pretty much the 
core of Japan's Greater East Asia Strategy.

Japanese class-A war criminal, Kenji 
Doihara: Dokihara worked hard in Beijing to 
study Chinese culture. Doihara was Japan's 
"China old hand".  He has read the Chinese 
Classic novels, "Three Kingdoms" and 
"Outlaws of the Marsh", and would speak a 
variety of dialects. Therefore, he was 
familiar with Chinese national 
characteristics. Thus, he was a man of 
integrity and righteousness. Doihara was 
also known by people as a man of his words 
and always keep his commitment. 
When he was the mayor of Shenyang, China, 
his expenses in running the city were 
reimbursed out of his own pockets, and he 
was oblivious to repay the money from his 
salary month to month. As a result, Doihara 
could only live with his whole family for a 
long time in a small house with only two 
rooms.
In addition, when Doihara interacted with 
people, their impression of him was usually 
affable, with the special rusticity of the 
native folks. Among many Chinese 
politicians, with whom he came into contact, 
there was a saying that "Doihara does not 
lie". 
Dohihara and Lu Yan Xishan, a powerful 
warlord, were classmates at Lu Da 
University. When Dohihara returned to 
China, he shuttled amidst the warlords, 
putting together the so-called "Great 
Northern League" against Chiang Kai-shek 
and Zhang Xueliang, who were on the side 
of America.
Dohihara put forward a plan to establish a 
Manchuria-Mongolian Republic. Regarding 
the head of the new nation, he proposed 
the former Qing Xuantong Emperor Puyi.
In October 1935, Doihara pushed for a 
North China Autonomous Movement.
However, the first on the list of war 
criminals submitted by the Chinese 
government to the International Military 
Tribunal for the Far East after the war was 
Doihara. How could such a self-sacrificing 
person become a war criminal? You see, if 
he didn't die, Chiang Kai-shek's dirty 
laundries could not be kept secret.
It is said that during the entire trial, the only 
remark made by Kenji Doihara was: "No 
appeal." Now, the secrets are safe.
Chinese military feared Dohihara like lambs 
fear tigers. It is said that Chiang Kai-shek 
was very disgusted with Doihara, calling him 
a "bandit",(the same way he called Mao), 
and he was put at the top of the list of war 
criminals, being personally ordered by 
Chiang Kai-shek. Doihara is the father of 
so-called "Han traitors"。
Finally, the Jews of the world are not known 
for being absent in big events of the world.
Here they were in the life and death of Asia.
A 1920's quote from Einstein on page 25 of 
the book, THEORETICAL MODERN HISTORY 
III by Seiji Fujii, owner of the APA Hotel 
chain in Japan:
Albert Einstein said, "The way to being a 
world-leading power is not military force or 
money; a nation must have a longer history 
than all other countries and the world's 
oldest, most precious pedigree.  World 
culture began in Asia and will return to Asia.  
Japan must be the peak of Asia.  We are 
thankful to God for creating the country of 
Japan for the human race."
Any Chinese would swear that Einstein was 
talking about China.  Well China is not too 
far off.  As another even more famous, also 
much larger scale Jew, Karl Marx, could very 
well have the same opinion about China.
Well, the smart Jews have the ability to 
think something, but do something entirely 
different -- to kind of protecting their own 
"God-chosen" status.
Guess that's how China got the opium and 
Japan got the abombs.